đź“° Curated Industry Article
This is a summary of a full article from a trusted insurance publication. Click “Read Full Article” below to read the complete story.
The agreement, reflected in Senate Bill 492, would create a program to try and more quickly pay claims for damages, deny short-term bonuses for utility CEOs for a year if the company starts a fire that kills at least one person and put requirements on attorneys seeking to represent victims.
But it did not go as far as Newsom was originally hoping for. The deal does not bar, or wind down, the ability of insurance companies to recover money from a utility after a fire, which Newsom had advocated for, but Assembly and
Newsom had leaned on legislators for weeks in largely behind-the-scenes negotiations, urging them to deliver what he saw as a series of urgent changes, which he said would prevent wildfire survivors from getting elbowed out of payouts by insurance companies and hedge funds, and support the future of a state fund used to reimburse claims after a utility-caused blaze. In a statement, Newsom called the agreement partial but not “full structural reform.”
“I urge the Legislature to build on this progress next year and finish the work we started to secure the Wildfire Fund’s long-term durability, stabilize electricity rates and ensure fire victims are never again turned into unsecured creditors in a bankruptcy proceeding,” he said.
The debate among

Insurance industry, consumer and wildfire victim groups labeled the governor’s effort a bailout for utility companies, and waged a public campaign against it. Every Fire Survivor’s Network, a group formed after last year’s
“Our legislators showed Californians what representative democracy can look like when elected leaders listen to the people they serve,” she said in a statement. “This is an enormous victory for every Californian who could become the victim of the next utility-caused fire.”
Insurance executives had warned Newsom and legislative leaders that taking away or reducing the ability to recover losses after a utility-caused wildfire would lead to price increases for homeowners across the state.
Major utility companies, including
The agreement does still include a series of changes, including preventing any attorney or company from selling the rights to recover a wildfire claim to a private equity group, a practice seen after the Eaton Fire. It would also require the
“After months of conversations on how we can advance the priorities of Californians, we have come to an agreement that supports survivors in their recovery, curbs
Negotiations over the deal took so long that the Legislature has to wait until Tuesday morning to act on the bill — a day after it was supposed to finish its work for the year — to comply with a state rule that requires measures to be in print for 72 hours before they are voted on. The bill now needs two-thirds support from both the Assembly and
©2026 The Sacramento Bee. Visit sacbee.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

The post California legislative leaders, Gov. Gavin Newsom announce utility wildfire deal appeared first on Insurance News | InsuranceNewsNet.
đź’ˇ What This Means For You
[fsi_dynamic_insight]
FARMER STOCKMAN INSURANCE
Protecting Your Future with Confidence
No pressure. No jargon. Just honest answers from advisors who genuinely care about your family’s protection.
đź“° This article is sourced from a trusted insurance industry publication. Farmer Stockman Insurance shares this for informational purposes only. Always consult a licensed advisor for personalized guidance.
