📰 Curated Industry Article
This is a summary of a full article from a trusted insurance publication. Click “Read Full Article” below to read the complete story.
The following information was released by the
Authors:
Managed care is the dominant delivery system for Medicaid enrollees with over three-quarters of Medicaid beneficiaries nationally enrolled in comprehensive managed care organizations (MCOs), accounting for half of total Medicaid spending in FY 2024. The 2025 federal budgetreconciliation lawis expected to create managed care rate setting challenges for states as theMedicaid provisionsimpacting enrollment and spending, including program financing changes, work requirements, and more frequent eligibility redeterminations for expansion adults, are rolled out. These changes can create uncertainty about enrollment and acuity as states and their actuaries develop capitation rates. Amid this uncertainty, executives from
States and plans expect to face new rate setting challenges with implementation of the 2025 reconciliation law. MCOs are at financial risk for services covered under their contracts, receiving a per member per month “capitation” payment for these services. Capitation rates must be actuarially sound and are applied prospectively, typically for a 12-month rating period, regardless of changes in health care costs or utilization. States may use a variety of risk mitigation tools to ensure payments are not too high or too low, including risk sharing arrangements, risk and acuity adjustments, medical loss ratios (MLR), or incentive and withhold arrangements. In KFF’s 2025 Medicaid budget survey, many states reported anticipating challenges with projecting the potential impacts of federal policy changes, including work requirements and more frequent eligibility redeterminations for expansion adults, which have implications for member enrollment and acuity (or health risk) on average. Provider tax and state directed payment caps and reductions are also expected to create managed care plan rate setting challenges.

These expected rate setting challenges follow a period of rate settinguncertainty that occurred as millions of peoplewere disenrolled during the “unwinding” of the pandemic-era Medicaid continuous enrollment provision. Higher member risk and utilization patterns began to emerge bylate 2023, and many states sought federal approval to adjust rates to address these shifts inFY 2024 and FY 2025. KFF analysis of
Overall changes in acuity from work requirements are uncertain. During unwinding, plans experienced an increase in member acuity as enrollment declined and remaining enrollees had higher health care needs and costs. Some multi-state parent firms have indicated publicly on earnings calls that they do not expect acuity changes going forward to be as significant (as the shift that occurred during / post unwinding), in part, because work requirement and more frequent eligibility determination policies target expansion adults (and not all Medicaid populations).
Five for-profit, publicly traded companies
Five For-Profit, Publicly Traded Companies Have Almost Half of the Medicaid MCO Market.
Share of total comprehensive Medicaid managed care organization (MCO) enrollment as of
Data are as of
KFF analysis of Medicaid Managed Care Enrollment Reports,
In
Elevance Health Has MCOs in 21 States.
States in which
Data are as of
KFF analysis of Medicaid Managed Care Enrollment Reports,
Wellpoint DC (an Elevance subsidiary) exited DC’s Medicaid program effective
The other large for-profit parent firms (
Managed care plan exits could lead to short-term administrative burden for providers and care disruptions for enrollees. For providers, plan transitions may create additional administrative burden at a time when many may also be helping enrollees navigate new eligibility requirements. Plan transitions may also cause disruptions in care for enrollees if their providers are now out-of-network or they need to obtain new prior authorizations. Disruptions may have more severe consequences for certain populations, such as enrollees who are pregnant or those in the middle of a course of treatment. Federal rules include requirements related to managed care enrollment processes and continuity of care. States can also set requirements for plan transitions through managed care contracts. For example, states can require exiting plans to provide notice of the exit within specified timeframes and to transfer data to the state and the plans receiving their enrollees. States can also set requirements for the receiving plans such as honoring prior authorizations granted by an enrollee’s previous plan and allowing enrollees to see out-of-network providers for a certain period after the transition.
Managed care plan exits could also have longer-term effects on the market. For example, plan exits could result in higher quality of care in the market if lower performing plans exit. At the same time, fewer plans in an (already concentrated) market could reduce competition which could have negative effects on cost, quality, and/or access. State procurement policies and program design can be used to help promote competition and quality in the market by influencing the number and mix of plans in a state.
This work was supported in part by
The post IMPLEMENTATION OF 2025 RECONCILIATION LAW: MEDICAID MANAGED CARE RATE SETTING UNCERTAINTY AND POTENTIAL PLAN EXITS appeared first on Insurance News | InsuranceNewsNet.
💡 What This Means For You
[post_title_image]📰 Curated Industry Article This is a summary of a full article from a trusted insurance publication. Click "Read Full Article" below to read the complete story.The following information was released…
FARMER STOCKMAN INSURANCE
Protecting Your Future with Confidence
No pressure. No jargon. Just honest answers from advisors who genuinely care about your family’s protection.
📰 This article is sourced from a trusted insurance industry publication. Farmer Stockman Insurance shares this for informational purposes only. Always consult a licensed advisor for personalized guidance.
